Labour woe: can they be saved?

Scottish Labour is bearing all of the hallmarks of being a party in terminal decline

Asking the voters

Any assessment of Labour woes must begin with a look at the state of play of their leadership. And if you’re of the Labour persuasion it won’t make for pleasant reading.


The headline figures reveal a picture where the public now see politics as a battle between the strong females. Only problem for Labour is, Kez isn’t one of them. Sturgeon has an impressive +34 approval, followed closely by Davidson with +31. Kez is languishing with a net negative rating, at a miserly -15. Extraordinarily, 2015 Labour voters give Tory leader Ruth Davidson a higher approval rating (+58) than they do their own UK leader Corbyn (-47).

What can this tell us apart from the blindingly obvious about Kez struggling to make any positive impact on the Scottish electorate?

Perhaps we could start with this: the tendency of Labour voters in Scotland to give Ruth a higher (much higher) approval compared to Corbyn (or even Sturgeon) helps explain something fundamental. In 2016 Holyrood GE we saw scores of examples of massive swings from Labour to Conservative in key constituencies; such as Eastwood or any of the border seats). And more broadly we saw a national picture of the centrist middle class soft ‘u’ unionists detach from Labour to Tory. I don’t wish to simplify what happened in Holyrood this year, but it is unarguable that many soft unionists of the middle class came to the conclusion that Ruth, not Scottish Labour, could best speak for them. These are the people sceptical of the SNP after  9 years in power. They were looking for an opposition party capable of actually holding a runaway SNP to account. Ruth appears to have convinced some number of these formerly habitual soft Labour middle class voters to defect to her team.

But the figures disguise something too. They actually hide the rising patchwork of problems for the SNP. While Nicola enjoys such high popularity personally, these leadership ratings don’t tell he whole story. Key policies of hers such as ‘named person scheme’ remain toxic for the majority of voters, and a perception is catching hold that the SNP are struggling to deliver effectively on education (‘curriculum for excellence’ has proven to be badly implemented & more working class kids go to uni in Eng than compared to Scotland). If Sturgeon pushes hard on named person and cannot deliver higher education standards and greater working class access to universities & colleges she may find her popularity comes unstuck. This is speculative on my part to a degree, but Sturgeon finds the possibility threatening enough that she has staked her premiership on delivering higher outcomes in the education portfolio.

But is Labour in a position to remotely capitalise on any future slowing of approval or support for the Nationalists? If Kezia is still their Scottish leader then surely not. And can Labour find a relevance at a UK stage as he largest opposition party to the Tories in Westminster? Not if Corbyn continues to squat in their leaders office they won’t.

Labour are in a clear bind. An unpopular leader both in Scotland and nationally. Held as incompetent by their former middle class voters, and struggling to gain any traction in the media. Add in the obvious reality that they are not in any position to capitalise on any future SNP difficulties – it is hard to see their way back.

Labour in each Holyrood GE has seen its MSP count drop, it is showing all the signs of a party in terminal decline. While the Scots Tories seem to be a party rediscovering a vote base (rural voters, farmers, middle class liberal suburbanites), the Labour party has surely lost one.



    • The approval ratings don’t lie. It is strange however, given he is running on he kind of hard-left 70’s throwback leftism that ‘old labour’ Scottish voters claim to crave.

      Maybe Scottish voters simply don’t view Labour as credible or competent enough to deliver anything that they promise? Or perhaps devolution has changed how Scottish voters see things, they might see UKLabour as less relevant to their needs?

      Who knows, I’m just speculating with all of this. All that I can claim to ‘know’ is that Corbyn is appallingly unpopular in Scotland.


  1. What this poll actually shows IMHO is that the hard core unionists are all that’s left in labour. They are so die hard that they would rather vote tory than independence parties. So for them identifying as british is more important than their lifestyle. They would rather live under a hard right May government than a centre left leaning scottish government.

    I live in Oz because I didn’t like the country that those above had foisted on Scotland because of their identity politics. May will be even more fanatically right wing than thatcher.

    rUK have no way out but Scotland and NI do. Grab it with both hands.

    You can’t seriously suggest corbyn is “hard left”. Youv’ve been reading too much MSM and watching TV.


    • I don’t think Ms May will be another Thatcher. She might be a female PM, but that is where the similarities end.

      May is not a ‘slash and burn’ free marketeer, she has already made some very interesting speeches about the need to shift from ‘shareowner democracy’ capitalism to a ‘stakeholder’ capitalist variant. Her policy proposal of forcing corporations and businesses to have workers on their directors board reflects this desire to change things, ensure working people have more ‘stake’ and ‘interaction’ with the free market consumerism going on around them. This is a million miles away from Mrs T & her ‘popular capitalism’ variety.

      As I say, Ms May isn’t going to be a rightwing PM, she was one of the earliest modernisers, and is most certainly a moderate and pragmatist – not a Tory rightwing ideologue.


  2. The questions asked were “Do you think X is doing well as party leader?” and in Sturgeon’s case, “as First Minister?”

    Kangaroo, I don’t know if that’s the case. Look at Tory/Lab scores on Sturgeon for one. It’s clear where the hardcore unionists are.


    • The article you link to confirms much of what I’ve been thinking.

      Increasingly clear that Labour are in terminal decline, and Ruth has usurped their role as the main opposition to the SNP.

      I am not surprised that Ruth Davidson is the most popular possible party leader among Labour voters. It reinforces the new reality, Scotland is divided on the central question: nationalist or unionist. Labour and their talk of egalitarian internationalist socialism simply doesn’t fit anymore.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s